Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority could reopen deductions and vary the assessable value after the Commissioner of Central Excise had already dropped the proceedings and accepted the factory gate sale price as the normal price under section 4, and no appeal had been filed against that adjudication order.
Analysis: A show cause notice relating to freight and rent on containers had been adjudicated by the Commissioner of Central Excise, who dropped the proceedings and directed finalisation of assessment on the basis of the factory gate sale price as the normal price. That order was not challenged by the Revenue. The assessment made consequentially by the Assistant Commissioner could therefore not be appealed in a manner that enlarged the scope of the earlier, unassailed adjudication. The appellate authority was bound by the limits of that earlier final order and could not go behind it.
Conclusion: The appellate order was unsustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.