Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the President had power under article 240 of the Constitution to promulgate a regulation extending the Income-tax Act, 1961, to Pondicherry; (ii) Whether the proviso to article 240(1), the constitutional scheme for Union territories, or the absence of a separate distribution of income-tax for Union territories restricted that power.
Issue (i): Whether the President had power under article 240 of the Constitution to promulgate a regulation extending the Income-tax Act, 1961, to Pondicherry.
Analysis: Article 240 confers a general power on the President to make regulations for the peace, progress and good government of specified Union territories, and such regulations may repeal or amend any Act of Parliament or existing law applicable to the territory. The expression is of wide import and is not confined to matters of public order or law and order. Since Parliament itself has plenary power under article 246(4) to legislate for Union territories on all matters, the President may also, by regulation under article 240, extend Parliamentary taxing legislation to a Union territory with suitable modifications. The regulation has the force and effect of an Act of Parliament applicable to that territory.
Conclusion: The President had power under article 240 to extend the Income-tax Act, 1961, to Pondicherry.
Issue (ii): Whether the proviso to article 240(1), the constitutional scheme for Union territories, or the absence of a separate distribution of income-tax for Union territories restricted that power.
Analysis: The proviso to article 240(1) only curtails the President's power after a legislature is created for the concerned Union territory and does not limit that power before such creation. The constitutional provisions relating to Union territories show that Parliament has plenary legislative authority, and the definition of