Transaction value in customs valuation cannot be rejected on quotation alone without evidence supporting enhancement or penalty.

Declared invoice value of imported ball and roller bearings cannot be rejected or enhanced merely on the basis of a foreign manufacturer's quotation when there is no evidence of contemporaneous imports or other material showing that the declared value is unacceptable. Transaction value must be accepted unless the conditions for rejection are established. A precedent involving a special relationship between importer and manufacturer was distinguished on that ground. On this basis, the valuation enhancement and consequential penalty were stated to be unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of imported ball and roller bearings could be rejected and enhanced on the basis of the foreign manufacturer's quotation, and whether the consequential penalty could be sustained.

Analysis: The valuation could not be displaced in the absence of evidence of contemporaneous imports or any material showing that the invoice value was unacceptable. In such circumstances, the transaction value was required to be accepted. The decision relied on the principle that rejection of transaction value is permissible only when the conditions for doing so are established. The departmental reliance on a different precedent was distinguishable because that case involved a special relationship between the importer and the manufacturer, which was absent here.

Conclusion: The enhancement of value was unsustainable and the penalty could not survive.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of evidence justifying rejection of the declared invoice value, transaction value must be accepted and valuation cannot be enhanced on mere quotation-based assumptions.

---