Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty demand had to be recalculated by treating the total consideration received from customers, including mark-up charges, as cum-duty price and by deducting the duty element therefrom.
Analysis: The Tribunal accepted the contention that, for the limited purpose of computation, the amount realised from customers had to be treated as cum-duty price. It directed that the duty subsequently demanded must be deducted from the total consideration received, and that the matter be reconsidered without being influenced by the observation that the contract placed the duty burden on the buyers. The reassessment was confined to recalculation of duty in accordance with this approach.
Conclusion: The assessee succeeded to the extent of obtaining remand for fresh computation on the cum-duty price basis.