Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on structural items used for fabrication of plant supports and related installations, and whether credit could be denied on the disputed items as mere building material.
Analysis: The governing test was whether the goods were used as components or accessories of plant and machinery, or whether they were merely construction material forming part of walls or other permanent structures. Items used to raise structures supporting machines and equipment fall within the scope of capital goods, whereas materials used only in construction of the plant structure do not. Applying the earlier view taken in the assessee's own case, the Tribunal held that the disputed items were generally used in the manner that qualified them as capital goods, except M.S. sections and M.S. shapes.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all the disputed items except M.S. sections and M.S. shapes, and the assessee succeeded to that limited extent.
Final Conclusion: The appeal resulted in partial relief, with credit upheld for the disputed items other than M.S. sections and M.S. shapes.
Ratio Decidendi: Structural materials used to support plant machinery and equipment may qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q, but materials used merely as construction material for permanent plant structures do not.