Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement and steel structure used in erection of a blast furnace are capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 57Q allowed credit only on machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about a change in any substance for manufacture of final products. The disputed cement and steel structure were used as construction material in erecting the blast furnace. A blast furnace may be an essential part of the manufacturing setup, but building material used to construct a plant cannot itself be treated as plant or equipment for the purposes of Rule 57Q. The reasoning applied the principle that materials used for construction of a plant are not goods used as plant in manufacture.
Conclusion: The cement and steel structure did not qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q and the denial of Modvat credit was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Building materials used in the construction or erection of a plant are not capital goods merely because they become part of the manufacturing infrastructure; the provision applies only to plant, machinery, equipment and similar goods directly used for producing or processing final products.