Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation received on destruction of business assets by fire was taxable as deemed business profits under the fourth proviso to section 10(2)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 when the business was not carried on and the assets were not used in the relevant previous year.
Analysis: The charging of excess insurance, salvage or compensation money under the fourth proviso was held to depend on the same strict approach applied to the cognate proviso dealing with sale proceeds. The proviso was construed to require that, in the previous year in which the money is received, the business must have been carried on for part or the whole of that year and the machinery must have been used in that year. The provision was treated as bringing to tax only escaped profits within the limits expressly laid down by the statute, and its language was not extended beyond those conditions.
Conclusion: The compensation amount was not taxable under the fourth proviso to section 10(2)(vii) on the facts found, and the answer was correctly given in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation, insurance or salvage moneys received for destroyed business assets are taxable as deemed profits only if the statutory conditions tied to use of the assets and continuance of the business in the previous year of receipt are satisfied; taxing provisions of this kind must be strictly construed.