Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer who does not avail the duty exemption under Notification No. 217/86 is entitled to take Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of the final products.
Analysis: The impugned order had followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in the respondents' own case, which had accepted the position that a manufacturer choosing not to avail the exemption could still take Modvat credit. The revenue relied on Notification No. 217/86 and contended that the captively consumed PVC film/sheet used in the manufacture of laminated fabric was exempt from duty. However, no order staying the earlier Tribunal decision was produced, and the earlier view remained operative for the dispute before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The respondents were entitled to avail Modvat credit, and the revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the assessee's entitlement to Modvat credit, as upheld in the impugned order, remained undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of any stay on the earlier decision, a manufacturer opting not to avail an exemption notification may claim Modvat credit on inputs used in manufacture.