Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loss suffered by the assessee on repayment of a joint borrowing, where the co-borrower became insolvent, was deductible as a business loss under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The borrowing was found to have been made in accordance with a recognised commercial practice in Bombay of financing business through joint and several liability. The arrangement enabled the assessee to obtain funds at a lower rate of interest and was integral to the conduct of its business. The loss arose directly from the business-linked borrowing transaction and was not a remote or capital loss. The essential elements of custom and mutuality, absent on the facts of the earlier distinguishable authorities, were found to exist here.
Conclusion: The loss was allowable as a business deduction and was rightly treated as deductible under section 10(2)(xv); the decision was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a borrowing is undertaken in the course of and as part of a recognised commercial practice of business financing, a loss arising from the borrower being compelled to discharge the full liability because the joint promisor fails to pay is a deductible business loss if it is sufficiently connected with the business and not merely capital in nature.