Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sums paid by the assessee in respect of a joint borrowing, including the amount spent in attempting recovery from the co-borrower, were deductible either as a bad debt, as a business loss, or as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business.
Analysis: The deduction could not be sustained under the provision governing expenditure, because the payments were not made in the relevant accounting year and were not expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business. The claim also failed as a bad debt, because the liability of the co-borrower arose by operation of law after discharge of the joint debt and was not a trading debt connected with the bookselling business. The loss was in substance a capital loss and was too remote from the conduct of the assessee's trade to qualify as a business deduction. The ruling allowing such a deduction in a money-lending business rested on special commercial usage and was confined to those facts.
Conclusion: The sums were not deductible as bad debts, business losses, or business expenditure, and the question was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A loss is deductible only if it is incidental to the trade itself and arises from the trading operations of that business; a capital loss or a liability incurred in a character other than that of trader is not an allowable deduction.