Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 2,87,422 waived by the assessee, being advances made against future sugarcane supplies, was a loss of capital or a revenue expenditure deductible in computing business profits.
Analysis: The advances were made as part of the assessee's business arrangement for securing future sugarcane supplies and were adjusted against the price of the crop. They were not made as an investment to acquire an enduring asset or as capital employed in a separate venture, but as an advance payment towards the purchase price of raw material for the business. The mere fact that the assessee ultimately forgave part of the amount did not alter the character of the outgoing; in substance, it remained connected with the trading operations of the business. On the capital and revenue distinction, the decisive test was whether the money was laid out to acquire an asset of enduring benefit or in the ordinary course of carrying on the business.
Conclusion: The amount was a revenue loss and not a capital loss, and it was deductible in computing the assessee's business income.
Ratio Decidendi: An advance made in the ordinary course of business as part payment of the price of trading stock is on revenue account, and a subsequent waiver or write-off of such advance does not convert it into a capital loss.