Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the acquisition of the electricity undertaking by the Government under the licence and the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 constituted a sale of the building, machinery and plant within the meaning of section 10(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The licence conditions, read with the relevant provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and the rules made thereunder, showed that the purchase option and the price payable were part of the agreed terms on which the licence was granted. The statutory scheme permitted the parties to settle the periods of purchase and the terms of valuation within the limits prescribed by the Act, and the exercise of the option arose from that contractual arrangement. The transaction therefore did not amount to a compulsory acquisition in the legal sense; it was a sale pursuant to the licence and the mutual undertaking embodied in it.
Conclusion: The acquisition was a sale within section 10(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the excess realised over the written down value was taxable as deemed profits.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a licence to supply electricity incorporates an agreed option of purchase on specified terms, the exercise of that option constitutes a contractual sale and not a compulsory acquisition for purposes of section 10(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.