Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether voluntary returns filed under section 22(3) after expiry of the period prescribed in section 34(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 were valid, and whether fresh assessments could be made on the basis of the Commissioner's order under section 33B.
Analysis: The return filed under section 22(3) is a valid return only if it is furnished before the assessment can lawfully be made. The Court held that the time limit in section 34(3) is a statutory fetter on the power of the Income-tax Officer to complete an assessment and cannot be waived by the assessee. The charging provisions create the liability, but the machinery provisions govern the lawful exercise of assessment power; once the period under section 34(3) expires, the ordinary machinery cannot be used unless the case falls within the statutory exceptions. On the facts, the returns for the assessment years 1953-54 to 1956-57 were filed after the expiry of the relevant period, and therefore could not support valid assessments.
Conclusion: The returns were invalid, and no fresh assessments could be made on the basis of the Commissioner's order under section 33B. The answer was in the affirmative.
Ratio Decidendi: A voluntary return under section 22(3) must be filed within the period during which assessment can lawfully be made, and expiry of the period prescribed in section 34(3) bars assessment unless the statute expressly permits reopening.