Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus arising on conversion of dollars retained for the purpose of acquiring capital goods, after sanction of the Reserve Bank of India, was taxable as business profit.
Analysis: The amount in question was originally a revenue receipt as commission, but it was later set apart under the authority of the Reserve Bank of India for the specific purpose of purchasing capital goods for the assessee's manufacturing business. That later appropriation was treated as an independent transaction directed to acquisition of capital assets and not as part of the assessee's trading operations. The mere fact that the dollars remained in the United States until repatriation did not alter the character of the transaction, and the gain arising from exchange fluctuation was attributable to capital employed for capital purposes.
Conclusion: The surplus was a capital accretion and not taxable as trading profit; the answer was against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the High Court's negative answers to the referred questions were affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where foreign currency, though originally received as revenue, is earmarked and held for acquisition of capital assets as part of a distinct capital transaction, any gain on exchange fluctuation on its realization is a capital receipt and not taxable income.