ITAT allows employee housing depreciation, restricts Section 14A disallowance to 2% of exempt income, remands transfer pricing matters

ITAT Chennai-AT rendered multiple decisions on various tax issues. The tribunal upheld disallowance of management fees under Section 35D(2)(c)(iv) and additional depreciation on leased assets under Section 32(1)(iia). For Section 80HHC deduction, the matter was remanded for recomputation based on net interest/rent following SC precedent in ACG Associated Capsules. Transfer pricing adjustments were remanded to consider revised Form 3CEB with proper comparables. The tribunal allowed depreciation on residential buildings used by employees, treating FCCN exchange gains as capital receipts, and volume discounts for spare parts sales. Disallowances under Section 14A were restricted to 2% of exempt income. Several matters were remanded for fresh consideration including aircraft depreciation, warranty provisions, and software license expenditure.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered by the Tribunal across the various appeals include:

• Whether the expenditure incurred on management fees and selling commission paid to lead managers in connection with Euro issue qualifies for deduction under section 35D(2)(c)(iv) of the Income-tax Act.
• Interpretation and applicability of section 35D regarding amortisation of preliminary expenses, particularly in the context of expansion or extension of industrial undertakings.
• Whether the 90% exclusion under Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC should apply to gross interest and rent or only to net interest and rent.
• Determination and treatment of Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustments in transfer pricing assessments, including the validity of revised Form 3CEB submissions and the application of the 5% tolerance limit.
• Allowability of additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) on leased assets and assets put to use for less than 180 days.
• Allowability of depreciation on residential buildings and treatment of depreciation rates applicable thereto.
• Whether foreign currency convertible notes (FCCN) issue expenses are capital or revenue expenditure.
• Tax treatment of exchange gains arising on FCCN, whether to be treated as revenue receipts or capital receipts.
• Allowability of depreciation on aircraft used by the assessee, including the necessity of DGCA licence and maintenance of log books to prove exclusive business use.
• Tax treatment of capital creditors written back and whether such amounts should be treated as income under section 41(1).
• Disallowance of expenditure on software licences under sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct tax at source.
• Applicability of disallowance under section 14A and Rule 8D regarding expenditure incurred to earn exempt income.
• Allowability of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) in light of provisions of section 43B and related notifications.
• Tax treatment of warranty provisions and whether such provisions constitute allowable expenditure under section 37.
• Allowability of wealth tax paid on business assets as deductible expenditure.
• Whether conversion of FCCN to shares results in income attracting tax deduction at source under section 40(a)(i).

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Deductibility of Management Fees and Selling Commission under Section 35D(2)(c)(iv)

The legal framework revolves around section 35D(2)(c)(iv) which allows amortisation of certain preliminary expenses including underwriting commission, brokerage, and charges for drafting, typing, printing, and advertisement of the prospectus. The assessee claimed deduction for fees paid to lead managers and selling commission related to Euro issue expenses.

The Tribunal examined the agreement which provided for a combined management and underwriting commission of 1.25% of the issue proceeds. The Assessing Officer (AO) allowed only 50% of this amount as underwriting commission for amortisation, disallowing the management fees portion.

The Tribunal relied heavily on the Madras High Court decision in the assessee's own case, which clarified that only those expenses explicitly mentioned in section 35D(2)(c)(iv) are allowable. The Court held that management commission is not covered under this section and hence disallowance of management fees was justified. The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention equating selling commission and management commission with underwriting commission.

Competing arguments included the assessee's reliance on judicial precedents equating expansion and extension of business for claiming amortisation and the Department's insistence on strict adherence to statutory language. The Tribunal concluded that the lower authorities correctly restricted the deduction to underwriting commission and related expenses only.

Issue 2: Application of Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC - Deduction on Interest and Rent

The assessee contended that the 90% exclusion under Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC should be applied on net interest and rent rather than gross amounts. The Supreme Court decision in ACG Associated Capsules Ltd was cited in support.

The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court held that 90% exclusion applies to the net interest or rent included in business profits, not the gross. The Department argued that only expenditure incurred to earn such income should be reduced.

The Tribunal remitted the issue to the AO for recomputation in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling, allowing the assessee's contention partly.

Issue 3: Transfer Pricing - Determination of Arm's Length Price and Revised Form 3CEB

The AO, based on the TPO's order, made adjustments to the ALP on individual transactions exceeding the 5% tolerance limit. The assessee argued that the 5% tolerance should apply to aggregate transactions with the associated enterprise, not each transaction separately, and that revised Form 3CEB submitted before completion of assessment should be considered.

The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the assessee's own case where it held that the TPO erred in rejecting the revised Form 3CEB on limitation grounds and that revised submissions with proper comparables should be considered. It remitted the matter to the AO for fresh consideration with opportunity to the assessee.

Regarding the 5% tolerance, the Tribunal upheld the AO's approach that price variation exceeding 5% on individual transactions justifies adjustment.

Issue 4: Additional Depreciation on Leased Assets and Assets Used Less Than 180 Days

The Tribunal consistently held that additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) is not allowable on leased assets as the assessee is in manufacturing business and leased assets do not qualify as plant and machinery for this purpose. Similarly, for assets used less than 180 days, only 50% additional depreciation is allowable with the balance to be claimed in subsequent years.

Issue 5: Depreciation on Residential Buildings

The Tribunal rejected the AO's restriction of depreciation at 5% on residential flats used by employees, holding that the circular relied on by AO was ambiguous and no distinction was made between employees' quarters within factory premises and residential flats away from factory. Depreciation was allowed at normal rates.

Issue 6: Foreign Currency Convertible Notes (FCCN) - Issue Expenses and Exchange Gains

The AO disallowed FCCN issue expenses as capital expenditure related to capital base expansion. The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents that issue expenses on debentures, whether convertible or non-convertible, are revenue in nature and allowable. Hence, the claim was allowed.

Regarding exchange gains on FCCN, the AO treated gains as revenue receipts since funds were not yet used for capital asset acquisition. The Tribunal distinguished between capital and revenue receipts based on actual use and held that gains arising from exchange fluctuations on FCCN should be treated as capital receipts once the funds are applied to capital assets. Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim treating such gains as capital receipts.

Issue 7: Depreciation on Aircraft

The AO disallowed depreciation on aircraft on grounds that the assessee did not maintain log books as required under Aircraft Rules and did not have DGCA licence for non-scheduled operator during the relevant year. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld this.

The Tribunal observed that permission from DGCA is required only for commercial operation, not for own business use. The Tribunal directed the AO to examine the issue afresh considering whether the aircraft was kept ready for business use and whether licence was necessary for such use. The ground was partly allowed for statistical purpose.

Issue 8: Capital Creditors Written Back

The AO added amounts written back relating to capital creditors to income under section 41(1) on the ground that cessation of liabilities constitutes income. The assessee contended that since the creditors were capital in nature, the amount should be adjusted against block of assets.

The Tribunal held that section 43(1) applies only to trading liabilities and that capital creditors written back should be treated as income under section 41(1). The addition was sustained.

Issue 9: Disallowance of Software Licence Expenditure under Sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia)

The AO disallowed software licence expenses for failure to deduct tax at source, treating payments as royalty under Explanation 4 to section 9(1)(vi). The assessee argued that payments were for operational software and only right to use was acquired, not copyright, thus not royalty.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) rejected this, relying on judicial precedents that software licence payments are royalty and subject to TDS. The Tribunal remitted the issue to AO for fresh consideration, observing that software is a capital asset eligible for depreciation and the nature of payments requires detailed examination.

Issue 10: Disallowance under Section 14A and Rule 8D

The Tribunal held that disallowance under section 14A for expenditure incurred to earn exempt income should be limited to 2% of exempt income as Rule 8D applies only from assessment year 2008-09 onwards. The AO's higher disallowance was set aside.

Issue 11: Allowability of Weighted Deduction under Section 35(2AB) vis-`a-vis Section 43B

The AO disallowed weighted deduction claimed on provisions for leave encashment and gratuity under section 35(2AB) due to non-payment as per section 43B. The Tribunal held that weighted deduction can be claimed only on actual payment basis and not on mere provisions, partly allowing the claim.

Issue 12: Warranty Provisions

The AO disallowed warranty provisions as contingent liabilities. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the claim relying on Supreme Court decision affirming allowability under section 37. The Tribunal remitted the issue for fresh examination to ensure provisions are based on actuarial or scientific method.

Issue 13: Wealth Tax on Business Assets

The Tribunal upheld the AO's disallowance of wealth tax paid on business assets as deductible expenditure under section 40(a)(iia), consistent with earlier decisions.

Issue 14: Conversion of FCCN to Shares and TDS under Section 40(a)(i)

The AO disallowed expenditure for failure to deduct tax on income accrued to non-residents on conversion of FCCN to shares. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Tribunal held that conversion does not amount to transfer or income accruing to note holders and hence no TDS obligation arises under section 40(a)(i).

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

"Only those expenses which are specified in the statute could be allowed and nothing else. The observations of the High Court are as under: 'The expenditure that qualified for consideration under Section 35D is restricted by reason of use of the phrase "being". Thus expenditure incurred in connection with the issue of shares and debentures of the company to public subscription, which qualify for consideration under Section 35D, are underwriting commission, brokerage and charges for drafting, typing, printing and advertisement of the prospectus and nothing more.'"

"The Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associated Capsules Ltd held that ninety per cent of not the gross rent or gross interest but only the interest or net rent, which had been included in the profits of business, was to be deducted under Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC."

"The Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the revised Form 3CEB on limitation grounds and that revised submissions with proper comparables should be considered. It remitted the matter to the AO for fresh consideration."

"Additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) is not allowable on leased assets as the assessee is in manufacturing business and leased assets do not qualify as plant and machinery for this purpose."

"Depreciation on residential flats used by employees is allowable at normal rates; restriction to 5% is not justified."

"Issue expenses on foreign currency convertible notes are revenue expenditure and allowable."

"Exchange gains on FCCN are to be treated as capital receipts once the funds are applied to capital assets; until then, gains are revenue in nature."

"Depreciation on aircraft is allowable if the aircraft is kept ready for business use; requirement of DGCA licence for own use is to be examined afresh."

"Capital creditors written back are income under section 41(1) and not to be adjusted against block of assets."

"Software licence payments are in the nature of royalty and subject to TDS; however, the nature of expenditure and capitalisation requires detailed examination."

"Disallowance under section 14A should be limited to 2% of exempt income where Rule 8D is not applicable."

"Weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) is allowable only on actual payments as per section 43B."

"Warranty provisions are allowable expenditure if based on actuarial or scientific method."

"Wealth tax on business assets is not deductible."

"Conversion of FCCN to shares does not attract TDS under section 40(a)(i) as no income accrues to note holders."

"The Tribunal consistently remitted issues for fresh consideration where factual and legal complexities required detailed examination, ensuring fair opportunity to the assessee."

---