Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim was barred by limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, and whether the benefit of the Explanation to Section 27(1) applied where the assessment was provisional, including in a short-landing claim.
Analysis: The bill of entry showed a contract entry and endorsement of contract particulars, supporting the finding that the assessment was provisional. Where assessment is provisional, the six-month period under Section 27 is computed from the date of adjustment of duty after final assessment, as stated in the Explanation to Section 27(1). The benefit of that Explanation is not confined to disputed assessments and extends to short-landing claims, because the duty incidence and refundable amount are not finally known until reconciliation and final assessment are completed.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held not to be time-barred, and the matter was sent back for reconsideration by the original adjudicating authority after hearing the applicants.