Tourist baggage re-export rules allowed detained gold jewellery to be re-exported, with duty demand not sustained.

Detained gold jewellery was treated as eligible for re-export under the Tourist Baggage Rules, 1978 where the traveller sought extension within the original period, acted bona fide, and kept the department informed. The rule permitting extension of stay by the Collector, and further extension by the Board beyond two years, was applied to hold that no prior direction for immediate re-export had been shown before detention. On that basis, the duty demand was treated as prohibitive in effect and was not sustained, and the jewellery was allowed to be re-exported within two months.

---

---

Issues: Whether the detained gold jewellery was liable to duty demand or whether it should be permitted to be re-exported under the Tourist Baggage Rules, 1978.

Analysis: The order noted that under the first proviso to Rule 2 of the Tourist Baggage Rules, 1978, the Collector could extend the period of stay, and the Board could extend it beyond two years. It was found that the applicant had sought extension within the original period, had acted bona fide, and had kept the department informed. The record did not show that any direction for immediate re-export had been given before the jewellery was detained. In these circumstances, the duty demand was treated as prohibitive in effect, and the proper course was to allow re-export rather than enforce the duty demand.

Conclusion: The request for re-export was accepted and the detained jewellery was allowed to be re-exported within two months, with the duty demand not sustained.

---