Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearance of goods and payment of duty pending finalisation of the classification list or price list could be treated as provisional assessment even without compliance with Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 9B lays down the formal procedure for provisional assessment and, where that procedure is followed, the duty payment is unquestionably provisional. The decision in Samrat International was read as holding that, during the period between filing and approval of the classification list, the duty paid on self-assessment was provisional notwithstanding the absence of strict compliance with Rule 9B. The later decision in Coastal Gases did not dilute that principle; it only dealt with the factual inability to establish provisional payment on the record in that case. The controlling principle is that duty paid during the pendency of approval of the classification or price list may itself be provisional by operation of law, even if the Rule 9B procedure was not followed.
Conclusion: Yes. Such payments can be treated as provisional even dehors Rule 9B, and the contrary view requiring proof of compliance with Rule 9B is not correct for payments made pending finalisation of the classification list or price list.
Ratio Decidendi: Duty paid pending finalisation of a classification list or price list may be provisional even without strict compliance with Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.