Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessments for the financial years 1998-99 to 2000-01 could be treated as provisional and required finalization under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1994.
Analysis: The governing rule permits provisional assessment where the value required for assessment is not available at the relevant time. On the date of the original order, the jurisdictional officer already had the complete information necessary to determine the assessable value and duty payable for the relevant financial years. In that situation, there was no basis to refuse finalization by insisting on a formal request for provisional assessment. The proper course was to finalize the assessments on the material already available.
Conclusion: The refusal to treat the assessments as provisional was unsustainable, and the assessments were directed to be finalized within the stipulated time. The appellant succeeded.