Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 93/88-C.E. when the duty payable on the vessel had already been discharged in the aggregate amount contemplated by the earlier customs notifications.
Analysis: The duty paid on the vessel was not in dispute, and the total levy contemplated under the applicable customs structure was Rs. 1,400 per LDT, being the sum of the customs duty and additional duty components. The refusal of exemption was based on a narrow reading of the proviso to Notification No. 93/88-C.E. The later Notification No. 63/91 was treated as clarificatory of the earlier notification. Since the assessee had already paid the full amount that could lawfully be recovered, denial of the exemption would have resulted in an impermissible additional demand.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification, and the impugned orders were unsustainable.