Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on furnace oil or LSHS used as fuel in the manufacture of both dutiable and exempted final products could be denied on the ground that separate accounts were not maintained.
Analysis: Rule 6(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 carves out an exception for inputs intended to be used as fuel. Where an input is used as fuel, the obligation to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in exempted goods does not apply. The Tribunal's view that credit could not be recovered in respect of fuel used in the manufacture of both duty-paid and exempted products was consistent with this exception.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee; CENVAT credit on furnace oil or LSHS used as fuel was admissible.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the statutory fuel exception protected the assessee from reversal of credit on such inputs.
Ratio Decidendi: When an input is intended to be used as fuel, Rule 6(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 exempts the manufacturer from maintaining separate accounts and the related CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely because the fuel is used in producing both dutiable and exempted goods.