Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sentence imposed for the offence under the Customs Act should be modified on account of the lapse of time, the period already undergone in detention, and the relative size of the contraband involved, and whether the sentence under the Gold (Control) Act should be interfered with.
Analysis: The revision related to a conviction for possession of foreign-origin gold biscuits and coins. In considering the prayer for leniency, the Court took note of the long pendency of the proceedings, the time elapsed since detection, the pre-trial detention already suffered, and the limited quantity involved. On that basis, the Court held that the custodial sentence under the Customs Act required modification. The sentence under the Gold (Control) Act was not found warranting interference and was left undisturbed.
Conclusion: The sentence under Section 135(1) of the Customs Act was reduced to imprisonment already undergone with enhanced fine, while the sentence under Section 85(1)(a) of the Gold (Control) Act was confirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the circumstances show prolonged delay, prior detention, and comparatively limited contraband quantity, the sentence may be modified on considerations of leniency and proportionality without disturbing the conviction or every component of punishment.