Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether second-hand photocopiers imported prior to the amendment were capital goods freely importable under the Foreign Trade Policy, or were second-hand goods whose import was restricted and required a licence, and whether the DGFT policy circulars governed such imports.
Analysis: The applicable policy provisions were read together with the DGFT circulars. The Court held that the circulars clarified that second-hand personal computers, laptops and photocopier machines fall within the category of second-hand goods and are governed by paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy, while they do not answer to the definition of capital goods under paragraph 9.10 and are not freely importable under paragraph 2.33. The Court further held that the circulars were not confined only to the EPCG Scheme in the manner suggested by the importer, and that the DGFT's clarification under paragraph 2.3 of the policy was binding. The later amendment permitting import only against licence did not alter the position for the imports in question.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the importer and in favour of Revenue. Second-hand photocopiers were held to be restricted imports governed by the DGFT circulars and not freely importable capital goods.