Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the question sought to be referred raised any substantial question of law, and whether the pipes and tubes in question were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The governing principle was that the eligibility of an item as capital goods depends on the use to which it is put. The Court applied the law laid down by the Supreme Court that the user test is decisive, and that actual assimilation into the final product is not required. On the facts found by the authorities, the pipes and tubes were used for carrying water for cooling in the plant and therefore were used in the manufacture of the final product. The Court also confined the reference to the three items specifically mentioned in the question and declined to enlarge its scope by the use of the word "etc.".
Conclusion: The question did not warrant reference, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration.