Common parlance test governs excise tariff classification, with factual inquiry needed where product nature remains uncertain.

Tariff classification of a product depends on its common parlance understanding, not its scientific or technical description. Applying that test, Lal Tail was treated as a medicament under Chapter 30 because it contained Ayurvedic ingredients, held a drug licence, and was supported by Ayurvedic prescriptions; the Revenue failed to dislodge the assessee's case. For Janam Ghunti, final classification could not be made without examining its manufacture, composition, and chemical test results, because the Chapter Notes required inquiry into whether it fell within excluded categories. The article underscores that factual and technical evidence may be necessary before a final tariff classification is reached.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the product Lal Tail was classifiable as a medicament under Chapter 30 or as a preparation under Chapter 33; and (ii) whether the classification of Janam Ghunti could be finally determined without inquiry into its manufacturing process, composition, and chemical test results.

Issue (i): Whether the product Lal Tail was classifiable as a medicament under Chapter 30 or as a preparation under Chapter 33.

Analysis: The controlling approach for tariff classification is the popular meaning or common parlance test, not the scientific or technical meaning. The product was shown to contain ingredients found in Ayurvedic texts, to hold a Drug Controller's licence, and to be supported by prescriptions of Ayurvedic doctors for therapeutic use. The Revenue produced no material to show that in common parlance the product was not understood as a medicament. The burden to displace the assessee's case remained on the Revenue and was not discharged.

Conclusion: Lal Tail was held to be a medicament and classifiable under Chapter 30, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the classification of Janam Ghunti could be finally determined without inquiry into its manufacturing process, composition, and chemical test results.

Analysis: Chapter Note 1(c) excludes aqueous distillates or aqueous solutions of essential oils from Chapter 30 even if suitable for medicinal use, and Chapter Note 1(d) excludes preparations of Chapter 33 even if they have therapeutic or prophylactic properties. Whether Janam Ghunti was an extraction or fell within the excluded categories required inquiry into its manufacture, composition, and chemical characteristics. The record was insufficient for a final classification without such examination.

Conclusion: The direction for further inquiry and the inability to decide the classification finally at that stage were upheld, against the assessee on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only to the extent that Lal Tail was directed to be classified as a medicament under Chapter 30, while the classification-related inquiry concerning Janam Ghunti was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Excise tariff classification of a product must be determined by its common parlance understanding and the Revenue bears the burden to show a different tariff identity; where the nature of the product cannot be decided without factual and technical inquiry, final classification may await such examination.

---