Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether 30% of the External Development Charges paid to HUDA could be disallowed under Section 40A(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 when the amount was neither claimed nor allowed as expenditure.
Analysis: Section 40A(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 permits disallowance where expenditure involving a payment is otherwise claimed or allowed and the requisite tax deduction has not been made. The assessment order and the profit and loss account showed that the relevant External Development Charges were not claimed as expenditure and had not been allowed. Consequently, the statutory condition for disallowance was absent.
Conclusion: The amount was not liable to disallowance under Section 40A(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: An amount that has neither been claimed nor allowed as expenditure cannot be disallowed under a provision governing disallowance of expenditure.