Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of cash deposits attributed to agricultural rental income of the HUF was sustainable.
Analysis: The HUF's ancestral agricultural landholding, the cultivators' identities and the receipt of agricultural rental income were supported by the record and had been accepted by the Assessing Officer. The absence of an earlier PAN or return declaration did not establish that the HUF was newly created or that the exempt agricultural rental receipts were unexplained. Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is a deeming provision involving a rebuttable presumption. Although the assessee bears the burden of explaining the nature and source of the money after ownership is established, the Revenue must first establish the statutory preconditions through cogent material. The addition could not be sustained on presumptions and guesswork where the explanation was supported by the HUF's background and agricultural income.
Conclusion: The addition under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.