Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference to the Valuation Officer under Section 142A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can validly be made before issuance of notice under Section 148 and in the absence of any pending assessment or reassessment proceedings.
Analysis: Section 142A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 permits a valuation reference for the purposes of making an assessment or reassessment, which requires the existence of pending assessment or reassessment proceedings at the time of reference. In the present case, the reference to the District Valuation Officer was made on 05.03.2015, whereas notice under Section 148 was issued only on 01.04.2015. Since no assessment or reassessment proceeding was pending on the date of reference, the foundational jurisdiction for invoking Section 142A was absent. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was directly based on such valuation report and therefore lacked legal support.
Conclusion: The reference under Section 142A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 having been made prior to initiation of reassessment proceedings was invalid, and the consequential addition was rightly deleted; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.