Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings initiated after four years under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were valid in the absence of failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts.
Analysis: The reassessment notices were issued beyond four years from the relevant assessment years, while original assessments had already been completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The recorded reasons incorrectly stated that no scrutiny assessments had been made and wrongly alleged undisclosed accommodation entries relating to penny stocks, although the assessee had not claimed such long-term capital gains or losses and had furnished relevant details during the original assessment proceedings. Under the first proviso to Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, reopening after four years requires failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The recorded reasons contained no such failure, and the jurisdictional condition for reopening was therefore not satisfied.
Conclusion: The reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the resultant assessments under Section 147 were without jurisdiction and were quashed.