Cenvat credit interest and penalty questions were admitted for hearing, with no final ruling on reversal, suppression, or intent.

Interest liability on wrongly availed but later reversed Cenvat credit before the 01.04.2012 amendment is identified as the central issue under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The text also raises whether absence of intent to evade duty and regular filing of returns negate suppression and penalty, and whether penalty requires fresh consideration in light of a cited Supreme Court decision. No legal issue was finally decided. The matter was admitted on the stated substantial questions of law and directed for further hearing, so the text records only the questions framed for adjudication and not any concluded legal ruling.

---

---

Issues: Whether interest under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is leviable on wrongly taken but subsequently reversed Cenvat credit prior to the amendment effective from 01.04.2012; whether absence of intention to evade duty and filing of returns excludes suppression and penalty; and whether penalty required consideration in light of the cited Supreme Court decision.

Outcome: The appeal was admitted on the stated substantial questions of law and directed to be listed for further hearing; no final adjudication was made on the issues.

---