Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte appellate order passed by the first appellate authority, without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing, required restoration of the appeal for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The appellate order did not disclose the dates or manner in which opportunity was granted to the assessee. In these circumstances, the order was treated as ex parte. As the assessee had not been heard on merits, and the Departmental Representative had no objection to restoration, the matter was considered fit for one more opportunity before the appellate authority. The substantive grievance relating to levy of interest was not finally adjudicated and was left to be examined in the restored proceedings.
Conclusion: The appeal was restored to the first appellate authority for fresh hearing on merits after granting reasonable opportunity to the assessee.