Reassessment reopening needs a live link to the assessee; vague search material cannot justify a retrospective notice.

Section 148 reopening based on search material requires prima facie information with a live link to the assessee's alleged escapement of income. The HC held that vague or non-specific seized material cannot sustain reassessment, especially where the relied-upon loose paper was dated after the sale deed, the Section 131 statement did not name the assessee, and no direct connection to the transaction was shown. As the revenue sought to apply the information retrospectively to an earlier sale without a concrete basis, the reopening notice was quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessment was sustainable when it was founded on seized material and a statement recorded during search proceedings, but the material relied upon was alleged to be vague, non-specific, and unrelated in time to the sale transaction of the assessee.

Analysis: Reopening on the basis of search-related information requires some prima facie material connecting the assessee with escapement of income. The material must have a live link with the assessee and cannot be acted upon in a vacuum. In the present case, the loose paper relied upon by the revenue bore a date subsequent to the assessee's sale deed, the statement recorded under Section 131 did not name the assessee, and the seized material did not establish any direct connection with the assessee's transaction. The Court found that the information was vague and was being applied retrospectively to the earlier sale deed, which did not furnish the requisite basis for reopening.

Conclusion: The reopening notice was not sustainable and was quashed.

---