Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excess sugarcane price paid by a co-operative sugar factory, in accordance with the State Government's price fixation under the State enactment, was allowable as a deduction under section 36(1)(xvii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee, a co-operative sugar factory, paid sugarcane price at Rs. 2,500 per metric ton, being the rate fixed by the Commissioner of Sugar, Government of Maharashtra. The dispute was whether deduction under section 36(1)(xvii) could be denied on the ground that the amount exceeded the Fair and Remunerative Price fixed under the Central regime. The relevant statutory framework included the Maharashtra Regulation of Sugarcane Price (Supplied to Factories) Act, 2013, under which the State-fixed price is payable in addition to FRP, and CBDT Circular No. 18/2021, which clarifies that the phrase 'price fixed or approved by the Government' includes price fixation by State Governments through State-level Acts, orders or other legal instruments regulating sugarcane purchase price, including a State Advised Price higher than the Central FRP.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 36(1)(xvii) was held allowable, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was directed to be deleted.