Search assessment addition deleted on factual findings; no substantial question of law arose in the revenue appeal.

On search-based addition, the Tribunal found that the seized loose/excel sheet contained only rough notings, did not name the assessees, and was unsupported by corroborative evidence; it therefore could not, by itself, sustain the addition despite statements recorded during search and the presumptions under sections 132(4) and 292C. The High Court treated these as pure findings of fact, found no perversity, and held that no substantial question of law arose under section 260A. The deletion of the addition was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made on the basis of seized material and statements recorded during search, and whether any substantial question of law arose for consideration in the revenue's appeal under section 260A.

Analysis: The addition was founded on a loose sheet or excel sheet allegedly showing cash payments over and above the sale price, together with search statements and the statutory presumptions under sections 132(4) and 292C. The Tribunal held that the seized material did not mention the assessees' names, contained only rough notings, was not supported by corroborative evidence, and could not by itself sustain the addition. It further held that the post-search admission did not, by itself, displace the need for evidence gathered in the course of search. The High Court found that these were pure findings of fact and that no perversity was shown.

Conclusion: The deletion of the addition was upheld, and the revenue's appeal was held not to raise any substantial question of law.

---