Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were wholly unexplained under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and to what extent the addition could be sustained.
Analysis: The assessee had filed returns for the relevant years and produced a cash flow statement showing an accumulated surplus from income from house property, other sources, and reduced personal drawings. The available material indicated some source for the deposits, though the entire accumulated surplus could not be treated as cash on hand. In the peculiar facts of the case, only a reasonable portion of the claimed surplus was accepted as explained source.
Conclusion: The addition under section 69A was restricted to 50% of the sustained amount, and the balance was treated as explained. The assessee succeeded only to that extent.