Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order should be set aside and the matter remitted so that the proceedings may be treated under Section 73 of the CGST Act and the petitioner may avail the benefit of the amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act.
Analysis: The petitioner expressed an intention to avail the amnesty scheme contemplated under Section 128A and sought reconsideration of the adjudication by treating the proceedings as those under Section 73. In view of that submission, and without expressing any opinion on the rival contentions, the Court found it appropriate to set aside the order-in-original and remit the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, with directions to proceed under Section 73 and to extend the benefit of the amnesty scheme if the petitioner makes a proper application.