Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte order confirming tax, interest and penalty under section 73 should be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on account of the petitioner not having filed a reply to the pre-intimation notice and show-cause notice.
Analysis: The petitioner had not submitted a reply to the notices or contested the proceedings before the assessing authority. The Court accepted the explanation that the omission was attributable to bonafide reasons and sufficient cause, and adopted a justice-oriented approach. In view of the absence of a reply and the request for one further opportunity, the Court found it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and restore the matter to the stage of reply to the show-cause notice.
Conclusion: The ex parte order was quashed and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law, with an opportunity to the petitioner to file reply and supporting material.