Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 in respect of the disputed period, and whether the orders confirming the demand could be quashed despite the petitioner's claim of prior payment already having been made.
Analysis: The petitioner had been issued SVLDRS-3 and had asserted that the service tax for the relevant period had already been paid during January 2017 to May 2017, supported by challans. The Court found that the respondents had erred in treating the payment as unpaid and in holding that the amounts already remitted could not be considered for the purpose of the Scheme. In light of the earlier decision relied upon and the undisputed prior payment, the rejection of the petitioner's claim under the Scheme was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to the benefit of the Scheme, and the impugned orders were quashed with a direction to reconsider the claim and issue Form SVLDR-4, subject to verification.