Share trading losses treated as genuine where documentary evidence outweighed general allegations of scrip manipulation.

Share trading losses were treated as genuine where the assessee produced contract notes, demat statements, bank records and proof of STT, and the trades were routed through recognised exchange mechanisms. General investigation material about manipulation in the relevant scrips was insufficient to disallow the loss without independent evidence linking the assessee to price rigging or accommodation entries. In the absence of any SEBI finding or other direct nexus evidence, the addition was founded on suspicion rather than proof. The loss was accepted as bona fide, and the disallowance in the Revenue's appeal was deleted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the losses arising from share transactions in Ashika Credit Capital Ltd. and similar scrips were bogus and liable to be disallowed on the basis of general investigation material without independent evidence linking the assessees to price rigging or accommodation entries.

Analysis: The assessee's transactions were supported by contract notes, demat statements, banking records and payment of STT, and were executed through recognised stock exchange mechanisms. The addition was based only on generalized observations regarding manipulation in the scrip and not on any material showing the assessees' participation in or nexus with the alleged rigging. No adverse finding from SEBI or other direct evidence was brought to dislodge the documentary trail. In the absence of cogent evidence, the disallowance rested on suspicion and conjecture rather than proof.

Conclusion: The share trading losses were held to be genuine. The disallowance of loss in the Revenue's appeal was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.

---