Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of alleged on-money payment towards purchase of flat was sustainable when it was based only on statements recorded in the search proceedings and no seized incriminating material or corroborative evidence linking the assessee to such payment was brought on record.
Analysis: The addition rested on the statements of persons associated with the builder group and on electronic material said to have been found in search, but the assessee was not provided any seized material showing actual payment by him. The record did not contain independent corroboration to establish that the assessee had paid Rs. 31,00,000/- over and above the agreement value. In the absence of such material, the mere reliance on builder statements was insufficient to sustain the addition.
Conclusion: The addition was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.