Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cash deposits found during the demonetisation period were liable to be assessed in full as unexplained income, or whether only the profit element embedded in the sales was taxable.
Analysis: The assessee's business records, stock register and cash book showed that the deposits were linked to recorded business activity, including bullion received from melting centres and sales effected during the relevant period. The search yielded no incriminating material establishing that the entire deposit represented undisclosed income. The statement recorded during search, though evidentiary, was not treated as conclusive in the absence of supporting material, and the absence of independent enquiry into the affidavits and stock records weakened the full addition. In such circumstances, the proper course was to estimate the income by applying a net profit rate, so that only the embedded profit and not the entire sales proceeds would be brought to tax.
Conclusion: The addition could not be sustained in full; only the estimated income of Rs. 32,92,080 was upheld and the balance addition was deleted.