Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to credit for tax deducted at source reflected in Form 26AS and to consequential interest on refund, and whether the revenue could successfully challenge the order allowing such relief.
Analysis: The dispute before the lower appellate authority was confined to non-grant of TDS credit despite the deduction being reflected in Form 26AS and duly remitted, along with the related claim for interest on the resulting refund. The material on record showed that the dividend receipt had been considered in the return and that the claim for TDS credit had to be examined with reference to section 199 and rule 37BA. The order under challenge did not suffer from any error on this limited controversy. The revenue's attempt to raise a different objection about the quantum of income was outside the scope of the issue actually decided below.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the TDS credit subject to verification under the statutory credit mechanism, and to consequential interest on refund. The revenue's appeal failed.