Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where the assessee claimed that no proper books of account were maintained, while the record showed VAT returns, debtor lists and turnover above the audit threshold.
Analysis: The assessee's own materials showed that business records existed in some form, including a list of sundry debtors and VAT returns, and the turnover exceeded the statutory limit. The Tribunal noted that books of account are not confined only to ledgers and cash books but include other records as well under Section 2(12A). On the facts, the assessee was required to maintain proper books and obtain audit under Section 44AB, and the failure to do so attracted the statutory penalty under Section 271B. The Tribunal also found the assessee's reliance on the cited case law inapplicable on the present facts.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271B was rightly sustained; the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee's records and returns show the existence of accounting material and the turnover crosses the audit threshold, failure to comply with the statutory requirement of maintaining audited books attracts penalty under Section 271B.