Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2008 (9) TMI 585 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Audit penalty under Income-tax law depends on maintained books, turnover threshold, strict limitation, and proof of reasonable cause. Penalty limitation under the Income-tax Act is computed strictly under section 275 with reference to the statutory completion and appellate-order ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Audit penalty under Income-tax law depends on maintained books, turnover threshold, strict limitation, and proof of reasonable cause.

                          Penalty limitation under the Income-tax Act is computed strictly under section 275 with reference to the statutory completion and appellate-order framework, and the Tribunal's contrary limitation view was incorrect. The article also explains that where the assessee maintained party-wise registers, cash sales records and purchase registers, books of account existed, so section 271B could apply for failure to get the accounts audited; section 271A is confined to cases where no books are maintained at all. It further notes that no reasonable cause was proved under section 273B, because the audit obligation under section 44AB depends on turnover and books of account, not on the income being commission-based.




                          Issues: (i) whether the penalty proceedings under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were barred by limitation under section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether penalty was leviable under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or only under section 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that no books of account were maintained; and (iii) whether the assessee had reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for not getting the accounts audited as required by section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue (i): whether the penalty proceedings under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were barred by limitation under section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

                          Analysis: The period of limitation for imposing penalty had to be computed with reference to the statutory scheme in section 275, which links the outer limit to the completion of the relevant proceedings and the date of receipt of appellate orders, whichever expires later. The show-cause notice and penalty order were both within the permissible time under the applicable clause, and the Tribunal had applied an incorrect limitation basis.

                          Conclusion: The finding of limitation was rejected and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.

                          Issue (ii): whether penalty was leviable under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or only under section 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that no books of account were maintained

                          Analysis: The assessee had maintained party-wise registers, cash sales records, and purchase registers, which constituted books of account within the statutory definition. The legal distinction is that section 271A is attracted only where no books at all are maintained, whereas where books exist but are not audited as required, section 271B can operate. The Tribunal's conclusion that no books were maintained was unsustainable on the record.

                          Conclusion: Penalty under section 271B was held to be attracted, and the alternative view under section 271A was rejected in favour of the Revenue.

                          Issue (iii): whether the assessee had reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for not getting the accounts audited as required by section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961

                          Analysis: Section 44AB mandates audit where turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold. The assessee's belief that only commission receipts below the threshold mattered did not excuse non-compliance, since the statutory test turned on turnover and the existence of books of account, not on the character of income as commission. Ignorance of the legal requirement was not accepted as sufficient cause.

                          Conclusion: No reasonable cause was established under section 273B, and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.

                          Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's order was set aside, and the penalty order as affirmed in first appeal was restored, with all substantial questions answered against the assessee.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee maintains books of account and turnover crosses the audit threshold, failure to get those accounts audited attracts section 271B unless sufficient cause is proved, and limitation must be computed strictly according to section 275's penalty framework.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found