Genuine share transactions cannot be taxed as unexplained income without specific evidence linking the assessee to penny stock rigging.

Genuine share-sale transactions supported by banking payments, dematerialisation records, stock exchange delivery and receipt of sale proceeds cannot be treated as unexplained income merely because the scrip was generally linked to alleged penny stock manipulation. A general investigation report, without specific material connecting the assessee to any rigging or sham arrangement and without discrediting the documentary trail, is insufficient to deny the capital gains claim or treat the gains as unexplained money. The addition was deleted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the long-term capital gains arising from sale of shares could be treated as unexplained money and the exemption claim under section 10(38) could be denied on the basis of a general investigation report concerning penny stock manipulation.

Analysis: The assessee supported the purchase and sale of shares with banking-channel payments, dematerialisation records, stock exchange sale transactions, and banking receipt of sale proceeds. No defect was found in the documents produced. The addition was made mainly on reliance upon a general investigation report about price rigging in certain scrips, but no material was brought on record to show that the assessee's own transactions were part of any manipulated or collusive arrangement. The absence of any link between the assessee and the alleged rigging, coupled with the unchallenged evidentiary trail, showed that the transactions could not be rejected merely on suspicion or on the basis of unrelated investigation material.

Conclusion: The long-term capital gains could not be assessed as unexplained money, and the addition was liable to be deleted. The assessee succeeded.

Final Conclusion: Genuine share transactions supported by documentary evidence cannot be disregarded merely because the scrip was generally associated with alleged penny stock manipulation, unless the Revenue establishes the assessee's own involvement in the rigging or sham arrangement.

Ratio Decidendi: A general investigation report about penny stock manipulation, without specific material linking the assessee to the alleged rigging and without discrediting the assessee's documentary evidence, is insufficient to treat disclosed share-sale gains as unexplained income.

---