Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant, being a listed company, was bound to comply with the SEBI circular requiring SCORES authentication and whether the penalty imposed for non-compliance under Section 15HB of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 was liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: The appellant contended that it was not a listed company and therefore the circular did not apply. The record showed that the company had only applied for delisting and no further steps were taken, with the result that its shares continued to remain listed on the stock exchanges. In that situation, the circular requiring listed companies to obtain SCORES authentication applied to the appellant. Non-compliance constituted a violation attracting penalty under Section 15HB. The quantum of penalty imposed, being far below the maximum prescribed, was not shown to be arbitrary, excessive or unreasonable.
Conclusion: The appellant was liable for non-compliance as a listed company, and the penalty imposed was not liable to be interfered with.