TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the delay of 451 days in filing the appeal deserved condonation. (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to relief in respect of the alleged timely payment under the Income Declaration Scheme and consequent issuance of the final form after verification.
Issue (i): Whether the delay of 451 days in filing the appeal deserved condonation.
Analysis: The appeal was filed belatedly because the assessee's case was said to have been affected by technical difficulties in reflecting payment, lack of effective communication of notices, and the assessee's limited familiarity with online processes. The record also indicated that the earlier appellate order had been passed ex parte. In the circumstances, the delay was examined on the touchstone of whether the explanation showed absence of intentional default and whether the cause of substantial justice should prevail over technical delay.
Conclusion: The delay of 451 days was condoned in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to relief in respect of the alleged timely payment under the Income Declaration Scheme and consequent issuance of the final form after verification.
Analysis: The assessee asserted that the final instalment had been tendered within time but credited to the Government account on the next working day because of bank holidays. The Tribunal relied on the CBDT clarification dealing with delayed banking credit and cases where the system matched full payment within the prescribed time, and held that the claim required factual verification by the Assessing Officer. The appropriate course was to verify the payment, record the matching of 100% payment, and move the matter for issuance of the final form in accordance with the Board's instructions.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification and consequential action, and the assessee was granted relief for statistical purposes.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the preliminary issue of delay and on the substantive issue the assessee obtained a remand-based, verification-linked relief, while the remaining grounds were rendered academic.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxpayer shows a bona fide explanation for delayed filing and the dispute turns on whether payment under a scheme was timely made but not properly reflected due to banking or system issues, the appellate authority may condone the delay and direct factual verification with consequential administrative action in line with the governing clarification.
TaxTMI 
