Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential actions for the assessment year 2016-2017 were sustainable when the issuing authority was alleged to lack jurisdiction in view of the CBDT circular/notification dated 29.03.2022.
Analysis: The writ petition was founded on the contention that, under the CBDT circular/notification dated 29.03.2022, the NFAC had exclusive power to issue notice under Section 148, and therefore the impugned notice issued by the concerned authority was without jurisdiction. The issue was stated to be covered by earlier coordinate bench decisions on the same question, and the Revenue did not dispute that position.
Conclusion: The challenge to the notice and consequential actions succeeded in principle, and the petition was disposed of in terms of the earlier coordinate bench decisions, leaving the Revenue to proceed only in accordance with law if so advised.