Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether customs duty could be demanded on the difference between the invoiced quantity of bulk liquid cargo and the quantity actually cleared from the shore tank, when the shortfall was claimed to have been lost before clearance for home consumption or warehousing.
Analysis: The levy of customs duty arises only on goods imported into India, and importation is complete only when the goods have been cleared for home consumption or permitted to be deposited in a warehouse. Where imported goods are lost, destroyed, or pilfered before such clearance, duty is not payable on the lost quantity. In the case of bulk liquid cargo, the governing basis for assessment is the quantity actually received in the shore tank, not the invoiced quantity, and the subsequent administrative circular also recognises this principle.
Conclusion: The demand on the short quantity could not be sustained, and the duty liability had to be confined to the quantity actually imported and received.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the duty demand and consequential confirmation were set aside with consequential relief as permitted by law.
Ratio Decidendi: Customs duty on bulk imports is chargeable only on the quantity that has completed importation and is actually received for clearance or warehousing, and not on goods lost before such stage.