Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for a self-assessment made and filed before 1 October 2015, the absence of formal communication or departmental acknowledgment of acceptance barred reopening and reassessment under Section 43(1) of the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004.
Analysis: The ruling turned on the legal position that, for tax periods prior to 1 October 2015, a self-assessment could be treated as accepted only if there was a formal communication or acknowledgment by the department. The Court also proceeded on the footing that payment of the assessed tax did not amount to waiver of the statutory right to seek revision. Applying the earlier coordinate Bench view, as confirmed by the Supreme Court, the Court found that the petitioner's self-assessment had neither been formally communicated as accepted nor acknowledged by the department. In those circumstances, reopening under Section 43(1) could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee. The self-assessment was held not to have been accepted, and the impugned order was set aside and quashed.